Contribute to nature positive outcomes across Australia


Announcements

24 Sep 2025

Hi NatureMapr Data Collector app users,If you experience the following error when attempting to upload sightings from the NatureMapr Data Collector mobile app, please note the following known issue an...


Continue reading

Platform update (mini)

NatureMapr moves to simpler, flatter national structure

Mobile App update and known issues

Platform improvement update

Discussion

ibaird wrote:
Yesterday
Yes,apparently Eochrois caminias is the best guess, supported by views expressed on iNaturalist (P. Hendry and Victor Fazio); but if correct clearly a variable, and/or perhaps sexually dimorphic speces. (I had looked at E. caminias but wasn't convinced initially).

Eochrois caminias
ibaird wrote:
Yesterday
Hi Lisa. Have you a verified source which identifies a case like this as belonging to the species Ardiosteres moretonella?

Ardiosteres moretonella
ibaird wrote:
Yesterday
I have usually attributed Canberra based records of P. arabella as apparently 'Philobota undescribed species near arabella' out of deference to the text and photographs of the similar undescribed species as described on page 64 of 'Moths in the ACT' (Cocling et al 2022), The photographs there showing the observed variation locally I think are essentially indistiguishable from this record on sight alone.

Philobota arabella
ibaird wrote:
Yesterday
The dark spots on the forewing are apparently not always visible in similar specimens.

Orescoa orites
ibaird wrote:
Yesterday
There are several quite similar Oenochroa (genus) species, but yes I agree that Oenochroa lactella is probably a better fit, based for example, on this record:-
https://biocache.ala.org.au/occurrences/95e66b44-7713-47d5-93a7-90fc734e4c9f

Oenochroa lactella
814,077 sightings of 23,356 species from 14,759 members
CCA 3.0 | privacy
NatureMapr is developed by at3am IT Pty Ltd and is proudly Australian made